I've been totally honest about Bixby.

I was totally honest about West Monroe beating Booker T Washington who beat Bixby twice in 2017.

I have no clue what you're doing. You're all over the map just because Bixby plays a crap schedule every year.

"we wish Bixby would schedule tougher" doesn't mean s*** to me.
Just acknowledge it's a fact they don't and let that be it!!

"we wish Bixby would schedule tougher" doesn't mean s*** to me.
Just acknowledge it's a fact they don't and let that be it!!

It's been acknowledged over and over again with your retarded ass. You're worse than Canes when it comes to accepting obvious defeat. You just don't get it, you dumb fuck....

(I apologize to everyone on the board. This all started when I ranked Bixby in my top 25.)

It's been acknowledged over and over again with your retarded ass. You're worse than Canes when it comes to accepting obvious defeat. You just don't get it, you dumb fuck....

(I apologize to everyone on the board. This all started when I ranked Bixby in my top 25.)

That's wrong too, hillbilly. Your nonsense poll is meaningless to me and and most other adults.

Bixby's SOS last year was "14.1"...... a disgrace and insult to a High School Football Top 25.
And what's worse Bixby has absolutely no desire whatsoever to improve that.

https://www.maxpreps.com/football/rankings/1/

The year Curtis "won" the National title, they were ranked 147th by the same computers he cites.

And to be honest, with that schedule, that is a little more accurate

I am glad red flag agrees that Curtis should be nowhere near the top hundred nationally that year

https://www.maxpreps.com/la/river-ridge/john-curtis-christian-patriots/football/12-13/rankings/

Curtis SOS that year was 16. It was right above a team from Montana.

I still haven't heard a good reason that Curtis should be top 25, let alone number 1 when they had one of the worst schedules in HSFB history.

But this guy is having a heart attack about Bixby and the same type of schedule. Actually, Bixby played a lot better teams at the top  than Curtis did that year

Curtis SOS that year was 16. It was right above a team from Montana.

I still haven't heard a good reason that Curtis should be top 25, let alone number 1 when they had one of the worst schedules in HSFB history.

But this guy is having a heart attack about Bixby and the same type of schedule. Actually, Bixby played a lot better teams at the top  than Curtis did that year

It's just mind-blowing how ridiculously dumb you actually are.

It's painful and tragic!

"Curtis without question should be super duper number 1 with a SOS of 16, but Bixby under no circumstance should he top 25 with a SOS of 14"

- Red Flag logic

Someone please tell Gaybob813 why he's the dumbest man on the planet.

I just really don't have the heart anymore. I mean that!

SMDH

Someone please tell Gaybob813 why he's the dumbest man on the planet.

I just really don't have the heart anymore. I mean that!

SMDH

You still didn't explain why Curtis should have been ranked over every other undefeated state champ in the country with a stronger SOS

So Curtis lost to Longview and Trinity the years Curtis won state. And Curtis has played 1 score down to the wire games with bad TX teams like Lufkin, Bishop Dunne and Bishop Lynch. All 3 were not good in any way and they gave state powerhouse Curtis a 4 quarter war.

And from 2004-2016 Texas teams beat a staggering TWELVE STATE CHAMPIONS FROM LOUISIANA!!!!!!!

And most didn't even sniff state and got thrown out of the 2/3 rounds

And we're supposed to believe that Curtis would have just magically been better than Allen, Desoto and Katy that year???

Desoto BEAT 6 national top 100 teams and lost a heartbreaker to national top 2 Allen. Allen won state against a slew of top teams and only had one loss when Kyler Murray was injured. Katy went 16-0

Curtis best in state opponent was ranked in the 700's!!!!!!

What the fuck is this brain dead inbred talking about!?

That's wrong too, hillbilly. Your nonsense poll is meaningless to me and and most other adults.

No it's not, redneck. You crave my poll and wait anxiously for it to be released every week.

The problem is all you did was "think it through", as a little bit of research would have uncovered that teams like Owasso, Jenks, and Mustang each had 3+ D1 signees (per 247) while the only team 2023 St. Thomas More played that could make that claim was Lafayette Christian. This makes the claim that Louisiana is markedly "tougher" than Oklahoma significantly more debatable than you'd like to lead on, as Louisiana's prowess at producing D1 talent ceases to be relevant to this conversation when one realizes that STM played but a small fraction of the state's best athletes in 2023.

You're demanding that STM get equal accolades to a team that was more dominant, more talented, and beat arguably better teams than what they did.  That's not a reasonable expectation.

This is so important to the division 1 signees argument we hear about all the time from certain states. Unless you have those guys on a certain team, they don't mean much in comparing HS football teams.

[the state as a whole doesn't produce an abundance of D1 prospects but the ones it does produce are concentrated at a small number of schools (see my last post; the only school on Karr's schedule that had more D1 signees than Owasso, Jenks, and Mustang was their lone OOS game against AHP),]

Bixby is a national power because they have a long stretch of dominance in a state that's always been well-regarded nationally as it relates to high school football. Like it or not Oklahoma produces quality high school teams - the state as a whole doesn't produce an abundance of D1 prospects but the ones it does produce are concentrated at a small number of schools (see my last post; the only school on Karr's schedule that had more D1 signees than Owasso, Jenks, and Mustang was their lone OOS game against AHP), and Oklahoma high school products have been #1 draft picks, Heisman winners, and Hall of Famers at a very consistent rate for a state that only recently tipped over the 4 million person mark.

Which tells us how terrible Karr's bracket really was.

Which tells us how terrible Karr's bracket really was.

You're as dumb as GayBob813.

Everyone Edna Karr played in the playoffs was better than who Bixby played in their State Championship game.

Look up the MaxPreps ratings of teams Bixby played in their playoffs then take a hike.

This is so important to the division 1 signees argument we hear about all the time from certain states. Unless you have those guys on a certain team, they don't mean much in comparing HS football teams.

steeler01 has definitely been pounding the "stupid vitamins"

Another totally ridiculous statement!

Whew!

I really don't even know why I bother!